Analysis of MLK's Letter from Birmingham Jail
Due: Oct. 13, 2008
Length: 1,000-1,500 words
Assignment Goal and Purpose:
For this assignment you are to write a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.'s Letter from Birmingham Jail (pg. 910 of your text). The idea here is to dissect the letter, tell me what works, what doesn't work, and why. You may want to consider:
- A summary of his argument, his opponent's argument, and the editorial that prompted his letter (this immediately precedes the essay). (This should definitely be included.)
- The issue, the situation/historical context (what prompted him to write this letter), and his "thesis." (This also should definitely be included.)
- How does he establish goodwill and fairness between him and the reader?
- How does he respond to his opponent's views?
- Does he fairly present his opponent's views?
- What assumptions does he make? His opponents' assumptions?
- Is he convincing? Why or why not?
- Does he use ethos? Pathos? Logos? If so, how?
- Why does he refer to the Apostle Paul and Socrates?
- What is the function of King's last three paragraphs?
- Why does King use the words "openly" and "lovingly" when talking about breaking unjust laws?
- What is King's definition of "civil disobedience"?
A successful paper will:
1.) Have well-supported and well-developed ideas.
2.) Be clear, focused, and unified.
3.) Use an engaging and appropriate style.
4.) Have a strong, clear thesis statement. This will guide the rest of your paper.
5.) Anticipate and respond to objections others will make to your argument.
6.) Progress from idea to idea in a logical manner.
7.) Have very few errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
*Please email me or see me after class if you have questions or need advice.
